Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucifer Valentine
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 21:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucifer Valentine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person does not appear to come close to meeting any of the notability criteria at WP:ARTIST. VQuakr (talk) 19:21, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non notable films director, received a lot of bootlegging awards which are also not relevant. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 19:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Although at first glance this director may not seem notable, he is relevant to pop culture, and therefore history. Even with just three films made, he has made an impact in the world of horror films. The trilogy is experimental horror made by a growing artist that will be around for some time to come. So, I believe a page for him, that can continue to grow, is suitable for wikipedia. User:AltJans67 —Preceding undated comment added 19:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC). [reply]
*Keep This director should be mentioned somewhere in wiki, his films may be stupid but I agree he has made an impact. There are sports figures on wiki with a page that played half a season for a cricket team in some random country, stuff like that, so why not some director that has made a few notable horror crapfests. User:rmartino873 20:35, 6 August 2011 (UTC)— Rmartino873 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Vquakr forgot to strike this one[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't find any significant coverage from reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Red Baboon (talk) 21:54, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I can not see any reason according to Wiki Specifications that this page should be removed. This person list movies currently made, a little information about the director, he is referenced in other Wiki pages, more obscure directors than he have biography on wiki. So I think they is more substantial reason to keep than to delete. Arbertie55 (talk) 22:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)— Arbertie55 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]
- Delete no evidence of genuine notability, support seems to be coming only from probable socks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I struck comments by confirmed sockpuppets of Rmartino873. VQuakr (talk) 19:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.